DisputeDispute this score

Motor Carrier Safety Report

DOT #3393151 · DIGGS TRANSPORT LLC

Generated

DIGGS TRANSPORT LLC

DOT# 3393151 MC# 1090882 Rockville, MD Authorized For-Hire / Exempt For-Hire / Private Property

jay664champ@gmail.com 8249 Front Loop, Rockville MD 20855

6 power units · all owned 5 drivers 1 mi/yr · ~0k per unit

HazMat

Not enough record

Graded once the record supports it

6 yrs history · 0 roadside inspections

Checking FMCSA…

Fleet & equipment

Power units: 6
Drivers · CDL: 5 · 5
Annual miles: 1

Type	Own	Total
Trucks	3	3
Tractors	2	2
Trailers	3	3

Registration

Registered: 02-08-2020 (6 yrs)
MCS-150 Update: 02-17-2025
FRED Score Date: Nov 07, 2026
Officer: JAY DIGGS JR

Cargo

65.7

medium risk

Household Goods Drive/Tow Away Metal: Sheets/Coils/Rolls Machinery/Large Objects Liquids/Gases Oilfield Equipment Livestock Meat Refrigerated Food General Freight Logs/Poles/Beams/Lumber Building Materials Fresh Produce Beverages Grain/Feed/Hay Dry Bulk Paper Products Utility Farm Supplies Construction Coal/Coke Chemicals

High-Risk Cargo: Drive/Tow Away, Machinery Large, Livestock, Oilfield Equipment, General Freight, Household Goods, Refrigerated Food, Meat

Note: "General Freight" is a catch-all; the actual cargo mix and its risk may differ.

Estimated from the commodity types reported to FMCSA, not from loss history or the true cargo mix.

Advisory Grade — Outside the Ranked Book

Fleets under 10 power units are graded against their size cohort (pu6_9) for reference, but sit outside the 10+ power-unit underwriting book the FRED rank covers.

Not enough record to grade yet.

No inspections and 1 crash on the FMCSA record in 24 months fit anything from an Excellent fleet to a Poor one.

Similar fleets: for-hire fleets of 6–9 trucks with the same kind of operation, years in business and amount of road activity. Compared using its own crash record and roadside inspections.

80% likely range 0.15×–3.16×

ExcellentStrongSatisf.SatisfactoryMarginalPoorCritical

▲ Similar fleets 1.0×

Expected crashes, next 12 months

0.1 vs 0.1 for similar fleets

Most likely none

This motor carrier

0.1

Similar fleets

0.1

A record this thin can't pin that down: about a 1-in-3 chance it runs at Poor-level crash rates.

Ask

Loss runs for the last 3 years, and confirm the fleet is operating at its filed size (6 power units).

What the record shows

Crash history

betterworse

Too little record to tell. 1 crash on the FMCSA record in 24 months (about 0.5 a year); similar fleets have about 0.1 a year.

Roadside inspections

betterworse

No roadside record. No inspections in the scoring window, so roadside results leave its estimate at typical.

Worth a closer look

From the FMCSA record. The estimate already counts the safety items; insurance filings and links to other motor carriers are context only.

Little roadside history

Only 0 inspections in 24 months for 6 power units; the record says little either way.

Ask: confirm the fleet is operating at the filed size.

Strengths

1 crash in 24 months. No injuries, no fatalities.

Data flags

Limited inspection history
Fewer than 5 roadside inspections on record, so there isn't enough data to score this motor carrier with high confidence — the score leans more on peers.

Track record

FMCSA record, last 24 months · grade scored on Sep 1, 2023 → Sep 30, 2026

Crashes

0 fatalities · 0 injuries · 0 tow-aways

Inspections

roadside inspections

Vehicle out-of-service

—

no inspections

National avg 22.3%

Driver out-of-service

—

no inspections

National avg 6.7%

Violations

0 out-of-service

vs 70,135 peer fleets

Inspections per power unit look like an outlier vs peers; read these rates with care.

	This motor carrier	Peers
Crashes	0.000	0.039
Inspections	0.00	1.41
Violations	0.00	1.44
Critical violations	0.00	0.26

	This motor carrier	Peers
Crashes	0.000	0.064
Inspections	0.00	2.29
Violations	0.00	2.40
Critical violations	0.00	0.42

Yearly rates from the last 24 months. Peers: Small (advisory) power units, medium-risk cargo.

What they get cited for

0 violations · 24 months

No violations on the FMCSA record in the last 24 months.

Violations by quarter

Tap a category to show or hide it

No violation trend data

Crashes

24 months

Oct

18

2024

Virginia
Property damage only
Dark - lighted, two-way trafficway divided positive barrier.

No other reportable crashes on the FMCSA record.

Insurance filed with FMCSA

FMCSA record through May 14, 2026 · no change recorded by FMCSA since

Today · live FMCSA check

Checking FMCSA…

Last on FMCSA's record (May 14, 2026): FMCSA lists no liability minimum for this authority.
Cargo filing: not required by FMCSA (household-goods motor carriers only); the cargo policy is not on FMCSA's record
Broker or forwarder bond: required · none on file

Who insures fleets like this →

FMCSA filings only, not a policy audit. Not part of the FRED grade. Wrong or out of date?

Where it happens

Loading map data…

How the estimate is calculated

The model, its inputs, the window it scored and its confidence. For actuaries and anyone checking the work.

Forward 12-Month Risk Outlook

The FRED Score predicts this motor carrier's crash risk over the next 12 months — how often they're likely to crash and how severe those crashes tend to be — versus a typical fleet of its size (6 power units: 6 filed, 1 seen roadside in 24 months).

Crash Outlook vs Peer Fleet

crashes per year · same scale

Average peer fleet

0.1

Actual, per year in window

0.3

Projected, next 12 mo

0.1

0 0.25 0.5

We'd expect a typical fleet of 6 power units this active to have about 0.1 crashes a year. This motor carrier recorded 1 in its scoring window (Sep 1, 2023 → Aug 31, 2026, about 0.3 a year) — about 4.9× a typical fleet. Factoring in its inspection and violation record inside that window and the credibility of its own experience, the model projects about 0.1 over the next 12 — about 1.4× the typical fleet. When this motor carrier does crash, those crashes tend to be substantially more severe than average — roughly 3.3× the injury/fatal weight of a typical crash.

Fatal-crash risk: less than a 1% chance in the next 12 months

Modeled fatal-crash rate is roughly 1.4× that of similar fleets (likelihood of at least one fatal crash, from its exposure and safety profile).

Track Record Used

Crashes Sep 1, 2023 → Aug 31, 2026 · inspections Oct 1, 2024 → Sep 30, 2026 · data as of Oct 29, 2026

Inside that window: 0 inspections and 1 crash.

Why there is no grade. Every grade but Satisfactory needs at least a 60% posterior past its cut; Satisfactory is what is left when none passes. Here the 80% likely range (0.15×–3.16×) still runs from below the Excellent cut (0.60×) to above the Poor cut (1.57×), so the record can't separate a best-in-class fleet from a poor one and the page shows no grade and no FRED Score. The forecasts are unchanged: in backtests, records this thin crash at their forecast on average but scatter about 2.6× as widely around it as records that support a Satisfactory grade.

Confidence: Prior-only · Z = 0.05 (posterior 0.14 × exposure corroboration) Provisional

Satisfactory — 1.38x its class rate (cuts: Excellent <0.60, Strong <0.76, Satisfactory <1.06, Marginal <1.57, Poor <2.11). Class rate 0.011 crashes per power-unit-year for a 6-unit for-hire fleet (pu6_9). Violations 1.00x (driver behaviour 1.00x, out-of-service 1.00x, all violations 1.00x; 0 inspections). Experience 1.38x: 0.4 decayed crashes against 0.1 expected over 36 months (credibility 0.14, a 0.64). 80% range 0.15–3.16x. Last change: no change since the last run.

No change since the previous weekly run.

Scoring flags Thin record (low credibility: little exposure behind the grade) (informational — no grade effect)

What Drives This Score

1.00× = this motor carrier's class rate

FRED multiplies three factors: the class rate a fleet of this size, class and activity is expected to run, a violation relativity from its roadside record, and its own crash experience over 36 months weighted by how much exposure stands behind it. The grade is the band of the resulting relativity to class, then the screens.

Class rate

1.1 crashes per 100 power-unit-years

6 power units · 0.07 expected crashes a year

Violation relativity

1.00×

0 inspections in window

Crash experience

1.38×

0.4 decayed crashes vs 0.1 expected · credibility 0.14

Driver behaviour

1.00×

Out-of-service rate

1.00×

All violations

1.00×

0×1× class2×+

Each sub-relativity is shrunk toward its cohort rate when the record is thin (Bühlmann credibility), so a short record reads close to 1.00×.

Relativity to class 1.38× (80% range 0.15–3.16×) · band Marginal → displayed Satisfactory · cuts: Excellent <0.60, Strong <0.76, Satisfactory <1.06, Marginal <1.57, Poor <2.11, Critical above

Full methodology · Scoring white paper · Validation study

FMCSA records

BASIC measures and every inspection, violation and crash, sortable and filterable.

FMCSA BASIC Scores

AB Property

Total Inspections

Driver Insp

Driver OOS

Vehicle Insp

Vehicle OOS

BASIC	Insp w/ Viol	Measure	Alert
Unsafe Driving	0	0.00
HOS Compliance	0	0.00
Driver Fitness	0	0.00
Controlled Substances	0	0.00
Vehicle Maintenance	0	0.00

SMS record data is sourced from FMCSA's Safety Measurement System and may cover a different time window than the scoring window used for the FRED grade (Sep 1, 2023 → Sep 30, 2026). Counts here may differ from the grade's in-window counts.

DIGGS TRANSPORT LLC

FMCSA Live Status

Fleet & equipment

Registration

Cargo

Worth a closer look

Track record

What they get cited for

Violations by quarter

Crashes

Insurance filed with FMCSA

Where it happens

Forward 12-Month Risk Outlook

FMCSA BASIC Scores

FMCSA Crash Records