E T TECHNOLOGIES INC

DOT# 370367 MC# 223716 DUNS# 116269861 Parker, CO Authorized For-Hire
(303) 680-9414 utah@ettechusa.com 10000 S Dransfeldt Rd Unit 100, Parker CO 80134
26 power units · all owned 48 drivers
HazMat
Satisfactory Provisional: the filed fleet isn't backed up by the roadside record (only 4 of the 26 filed power units were seen at a roadside inspection in 24 months), so the grade can't lean on this motor carrier's own history until the fleet size is confirmed.
FRED Score 74.7 / 100
Prior-only confidence
37 yrs history · 5 roadside inspections

FMCSA Live Status

Checking FMCSA…

Fleet & equipment

Power units
26
Drivers · CDL
48 · 7
Annual miles
429k unreliable
Type Own Term Trip Total
Trucks 23 0 0 23
Tractors 0 0 0 0
Trailers 3 0 0 3

Registration

Organization
CORPORATION
Registered
10-19-1989 (37 yrs)
MCS-150 Update
09-08-2026 (Biennial Update)
FRED Score Date
Nov 07, 2026
Officer
MATT JONES
Officer
JEFF ROEHRIG

Cargo

32.6
low risk
Building Materials Other: WASTE CONTAMINATED SOILS Construction

Estimated from the commodity types reported to FMCSA, not from loss history or the true cargo mix.

Exposure Unverified

The expected crashes behind this grade assume the filed fleet of 26 power units is real, but the roadside record corroborates little of it — 4 units seen in 24 months, 0.08 inspections per filed unit-year. The grade's relativity to class is unchanged; its confidence tier is cut to reflect the unverified exposure, and until the fleet is confirmed an Excellent grade shows as Strong and a Strong as Satisfactory. Verify the fleet size before relying on the crash expectation.

Mileage Unreliable

MCS-150 annual mileage appears too low for fleet size given observed activity. The per-100k-mile rate benchmarks on this page are excluded; the FRED grade does not use mileage (crash exposure is power-unit-years, violation exposure is inspection counts).

Too little record to tell how this motor carrier's crash rate compares with similar fleets.

Similar fleets: for-hire fleets of 20–49 trucks with the same kind of operation, years in business and amount of road activity. Compared using its own crash record and roadside inspections.

This motor carrier 0.76×
ExcellentStrongSatisf.MarginalPoorCritical
▲ Similar fleets 1.0×
Expected crashes, next 12 months
0.3 vs 0.4 for similar fleets
Likely 0–1 crashes
This motor carrier
0.3
Similar fleets
0.4
Chance of a fatal crash, next 12 months
<1%
Below similar fleets.
What's driving the grade
Crash history
betterworse
Too little record to tell. 0 crashes on the FMCSA record in 24 months; similar fleets have about 0.4 a year.
Roadside inspections
betterworse
Much worse than peers. Out-of-service orders 2.14×, violations 1.40× and unsafe-driving and hours-of-service violations 1.30× the rate expected for its inspections. Together they move its crash estimate +13%: roadside results weigh far less than crash history.

Worth a closer look

From the FMCSA record. The grade already counts the safety items; insurance filings and links to other motor carriers are not in it.

  • Drivers put out of service
    4 out-of-service violations against drivers: 2 hours of service, 2 no valid CDL (Feb 2025 – Apr 2025).
    Ask: driver supervision and dispatch practices.
  • Filed fleet not seen on the road
    Only 4 of the 26 filed power units were seen at a roadside inspection in 24 months (5 inspections in all). The crash expectation behind the grade assumes all 26 are running.
    Ask: how many trucks are actually operating, with the vehicle schedule.
Strengths
  • No reportable crashes in 24 months.
Data flags
  • Unreliable reported mileage
    The motor carrier's self-reported annual mileage (MCS-150) looks implausible, so exposure- and mileage-based figures may be distorted.
  • Estimated mileage
    No usable mileage was reported, so exposure was estimated from similar motor carriers. Mileage-based metrics here are approximate.
  • Limited inspection history
    Fewer than 5 roadside inspections on record, so there isn't enough data to score this motor carrier with high confidence — the score leans more on peers.

Track record

FMCSA record, Sep 2024 – Apr 2026 · grade scored on Sep 1, 2023 → Sep 30, 2026
Crashes
0
0 fatalities · 0 injuries · 0 tow-aways
Inspections
5
0% clean (no violations)
Vehicle out-of-service
80.0%
4 of 5
National avg 22.3%
Driver out-of-service
40.0%
2 of 5
National avg 6.7%
Violations
14
9 out-of-service
Inspections per quarter With an out-of-service order
Q4 '24: 0 inspections, 0 out of service 0 Q4 '24 Q1 '25: 1 inspections, 1 out of service 1 Q1 '25 Q2 '25: 2 inspections, 2 out of service 2 Q2 '25 Q3 '25: 0 inspections, 0 out of service 0 Q3 '25 Q4 '25: 0 inspections, 0 out of service 0 Q4 '25 Q1 '26: 0 inspections, 0 out of service 0 Q1 '26 Q2 '26: 1 inspections, 1 out of service 1 Q2 '26
Sep 25–30, 2024 isn't charted (too little of that quarter is on file); the 24-month totals include its 1 inspection.
vs 721 peer fleets
This motor carrierPeers
Crashes 0.000 0.019
Inspections 0.15 0.53
Violations 0.27 0.27
Critical violations 0.06 0.05

Yearly rates from the last 24 months. Peers: 20–49 power units, low-risk cargo.

What they get cited for

14 violations · 24 months
  • Vehicle maintenance No alert
    10 · 5 OOS
    Brakes 2 · Tires 2 · Cargo securement 1 · Lights 1 · Wheels & hubs 1 · 3 more
  • Hours of service No alert
    2 · 2 OOS
    No log 2
  • Driver fitness No alert
    2 · 2 OOS
    No valid CDL 2
  • Unsafe driving No alert
    0
  • Drugs & alcohol No alert
    0
Out-of-service violations “No alert” = under FMCSA's BASIC intervention threshold

Violations by quarter

Tap a category to show or hide it
No violation trend data

Crashes

24 months

No reportable crashes on the FMCSA record in the last 24 months.

Insurance filed with FMCSA

FMCSA record through Nov 2, 2026
Today · live FMCSA check
Checking FMCSA…
Liability (BIPD)
$1,000,000 · The Cincinnati Indemnity Company
on record since Jul 1, 2026 · FMCSA minimum $1,000,000 · no gap on FMCSA's record since Jan 2018
Cargo filing
not required by FMCSA (household-goods motor carriers only); the cargo policy is not on FMCSA's record
36 months to Nov 2, 2026
  • 3 liability insurers on FMCSA's record, 2 changes: Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company → The Cincinnati Indemnity Company (Jul 2026); HANOVER INSURANCE CO. → ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (Jul 2024)
  • No gap in filed liability coverage while liability was required
  • 1 liability filing received late (the last received Sep 15, 2026 for an effective date of Jul 1, 2026); FMCSA had no filing on record in between

Operating authority active (FMCSA's new registration system, status since May 3, 2018)

Who insures fleets like this →

FMCSA filings only, not a policy audit. Not part of the FRED grade. Wrong or out of date?

Where it happens

Loading map data…
Inspections by state
  • Utah 2
  • Colorado (HQ) 1
  • Montana 1
  • Wyoming 1