ANA ISABEL TERRAZAS CERROS

DOT# 3952153 MX# 1571948 Cuauhtemoc, CI Authorized For-Hire
(625) 125-9007 anatcerros@gmail.com Calle 16 #384 Centro, Cuauhtemoc CI 31500
4 tractors · all owned 4 drivers
Marginal Provisional: the record is still thin. A fleet of 4 power units would expect only about 0.0 crashes over the 36-month scoring window, and it had 11 inspections and 1 crash in that time, so the grade leans mostly on what's typical for similar fleets and can move as more inspections and time on the road build up.
FRED Score 30.0 / 100
Prior-only confidence
4 yrs history · 9 roadside inspections

FMCSA Live Status

Checking FMCSA…

Fleet & equipment

Power units
4
Drivers · CDL
4 · 4
Annual miles
85k unreliable
Type Own Term Trip Total
Trucks 0 0 0 0
Tractors 4 0 0 4
Trailers 4 0 0 4

Registration

Registered
09-13-2022 (4 yrs)
MCS-150 Update
06-15-2025
FRED Score Date
Nov 07, 2026
Officer
ANA ISABEL TERRAZAS CEROS

Cargo

73.0
high risk
Machinery/Large Objects
High-Risk Cargo
Machinery Large

Estimated from the commodity types reported to FMCSA, not from loss history or the true cargo mix.

Advisory Grade — Outside the Ranked Book

Fleets under 10 power units are graded against their size cohort (pu2_5) for reference, but sit outside the 10+ power-unit underwriting book the FRED rank covers.

Mileage Unreliable

MCS-150 annual mileage appears too low for fleet size given observed activity. The per-100k-mile rate benchmarks on this page are excluded; the FRED grade does not use mileage (crash exposure is power-unit-years, violation exposure is inspection counts).

Expected crash rate is probably higher than similar fleets (about a 70% chance), but the record is too thin to say by how much.

Similar fleets: for-hire fleets of 2–5 trucks with the same kind of operation, years in business and amount of road activity. Compared using its own crash record and roadside inspections.

Per truck, fleets like this one are expected to crash about 0.2× as often as the median active fleet of 2–5 trucks.

This motor carrier 2.34×
ExcellentStrongSatisf.MarginalPoorCritical
▲ Similar fleets 1.0×
Leaning Critical. Its estimate (2.34× similar fleets) is in the Critical range, but the record isn't strong enough to be 60% sure it is above the Critical line (2.11×), so the grade stays Marginal.
Expected crashes, next 12 months
0.0 vs 0.0 for similar fleets
Most likely none
This motor carrier
0.0
Similar fleets
0.0
Chance of a fatal crash, next 12 months
<1%
About 2.3× similar fleets.
What's driving the grade
Crash history
betterworse
Leans worse, not yet proven. 1 crash on the FMCSA record in 24 months (about 0.5 a year); similar fleets have under 0.1 a year.
Roadside inspections
betterworse
Much worse than peers. Out-of-service orders 3.12× and violations 2.47× the rate expected for its inspections. Together they move its crash estimate +19%. It's inspected more often than most fleets its size.

Worth a closer look

From the FMCSA record. The grade already counts the safety items; insurance filings and links to other motor carriers are not in it.

  • Drivers put out of service
    4 out-of-service violations against drivers: 2 hours of service, 1 no valid CDL, 1 English proficiency (Feb 2025 – Aug 2025).
    Ask: driver supervision and dispatch practices.
  • Brakes and cargo securement
    Brakes are 8 of 22 violations (36%). Brake or cargo securement defects led to 6 out-of-service orders.
    Ask: the preventive-maintenance schedule and shop records.
  • Cross-border operation
    6 inspections on Mexico-plated units; 44% of all inspections were in Texas.
    Ask: operating radius and Mexico lanes.
Strengths
  • 1 crash in 24 months. No injuries, no fatalities.
Data flags
  • Unreliable reported mileage
    The motor carrier's self-reported annual mileage (MCS-150) looks implausible, so exposure- and mileage-based figures may be distorted.
  • Estimated mileage
    No usable mileage was reported, so exposure was estimated from similar motor carriers. Mileage-based metrics here are approximate.
  • Mexico-domiciled motor carrier
    Domiciled in Mexico — cross-border operating rules and inspection patterns differ from US-based motor carriers.

Track record

FMCSA record, Feb 2025 – Sep 2026 · grade scored on Sep 1, 2023 → Sep 30, 2026
Crashes
1
0 fatalities · 0 injuries · 0 tow-aways
Inspections
9
22% clean (no violations)
Vehicle out-of-service
66.7%
6 of 9
National avg 22.3%
Driver out-of-service
33.3%
3 of 9
National avg 6.7%
Violations
22
11 out-of-service
Inspections per quarter With an out-of-service order
Q1 '25: 1 inspections, 1 out of service 1 Q1 '25 Q2 '25: 0 inspections, 0 out of service 0 Q2 '25 Q3 '25: 2 inspections, 2 out of service 2 Q3 '25 Q4 '25: 3 inspections, 1 out of service 3 Q4 '25 Q1 '26: 0 inspections, 0 out of service 0 Q1 '26 Q2 '26: 1 inspections, 1 out of service 1 Q2 '26 Q3 '26: 2 inspections, 2 out of service 2 Q3 '26
vs 6,610 peer fleets
This motor carrierPeers
Crashes 0.125 0.032
Inspections 2.50 1.10
Violations 2.75 1.04
Critical violations 0.38 0.21

Yearly rates from the last 24 months. Peers: Small (advisory) power units, high-risk cargo.

What they get cited for

22 violations · 24 months
  • Vehicle maintenance No alert
    18 · 7 OOS
    Brakes 8 · Cargo securement 3 · Lights 2 · Tires 1 · Other parts 4
  • Hours of service No alert
    2 · 2 OOS
    No log 2
  • Driver fitness No alert
    2 · 2 OOS
    English proficiency 1 · No valid CDL 1
  • Unsafe driving No alert
    0
  • Drugs & alcohol No alert
    0
Out-of-service violations “No alert” = under FMCSA's BASIC intervention threshold

Violations by quarter

Tap a category to show or hide it
No violation trend data

Crashes

24 months
  • Oct
    31
    2025
    West Virginia
    Property damage only
    Daylight, two-way trafficway divided unprotected median.

No other reportable crashes on the FMCSA record.

Insurance filed with FMCSA

FMCSA record through Nov 2, 2026
Today · live FMCSA check
Checking FMCSA…
Liability (BIPD)
FMCSA lists no liability minimum for this authority.
Cargo filing
not required by FMCSA (household-goods motor carriers only); the cargo policy is not on FMCSA's record

Mexico-domiciled operating authority active (FMCSA's new registration system, status since Aug 11, 2023)

Who insures fleets like this →

FMCSA filings only, not a policy audit. Not part of the FRED grade. Wrong or out of date?

Where it happens

Loading map data…
Inspections by state
  • Texas 4
  • New Mexico 2
  • Mississippi 1
  • Federal inspectors 1
  • West Virginia 1