KIMBALL RENTALS LLC

DBA: KIMBALL EQUIPMENT CO

DOT# 662175 DUNS# 35369255 Salt Lake City, UT Authorized For-Hire / Exempt For-Hire / Private Property
(801) 546-2255 soliver@kimballequipment.com 5205 W Wiley Post Way, Salt Lake City UT 84116
77 power units · all owned 130 drivers
Satisfactory
FRED Score 73.0 / 100
Low confidence
30 yrs history · 12 roadside inspections

FMCSA Live Status

Checking FMCSA…

Fleet & equipment

Power units
77
Drivers · CDL
130 · 9
Annual miles
1.5M unreliable
Type Own Term Trip Total
Trucks 77 0 0 77
Tractors 0 0 0 0
Trailers 23 0 0 23

Registration

Registered
10-08-1996 (30 yrs)
MCS-150 Update
04-09-2025 (Biennial Update)
FRED Score Date
Nov 07, 2026
Officer
JOHN KIMBALL
Officer
KIRK RAINBOLT

Cargo

62.7
medium risk
Machinery/Large Objects General Freight Building Materials Other: ROCK CRUSHING AND MINING PARTS Construction
High-Risk Cargo
Machinery Large, General Freight

Note: "General Freight" is a catch-all; the actual cargo mix and its risk may differ.

Estimated from the commodity types reported to FMCSA, not from loss history or the true cargo mix.

Exposure Unverified

The expected crashes behind this grade assume the filed fleet of 77 power units is real, but the roadside record corroborates little of it — 13 units seen in 24 months, 0.08 inspections per filed unit-year. The grade's relativity to class is unchanged; its confidence tier is cut to reflect the unverified exposure, and until the fleet is confirmed an Excellent grade shows as Strong and a Strong as Satisfactory. Verify the fleet size before relying on the crash expectation.

Mileage Unreliable

MCS-150 annual mileage appears too low for fleet size given observed activity. The per-100k-mile rate benchmarks on this page are excluded; the FRED grade does not use mileage (crash exposure is power-unit-years, violation exposure is inspection counts).

Expected crash rate is probably lower than similar fleets (about a 70% chance), but the record is too thin to say by how much.

Similar fleets: interstate fleets of 50–99 trucks with the same kind of operation, years in business and amount of road activity. Compared using its own crash record and roadside inspections.

This motor carrier 0.78×
ExcellentStrongSatisf.MarginalPoorCritical
▲ Similar fleets 1.0×
Expected crashes, next 12 months
0.9 vs 1.2 for similar fleets
Likely 0–2 crashes
This motor carrier
0.9
Similar fleets
1.2
Chance of a fatal crash, next 12 months
~2%
About typical for similar fleets.
What's driving the grade
Crash history
betterworse
Leans better, not yet proven. 1 crash on the FMCSA record in 24 months (about 0.5 a year); similar fleets have about 1.2 a year.
Roadside inspections
betterworse
Worse than peers. Violations 1.57× and unsafe-driving and hours-of-service violations 1.28× the rate expected for its inspections. Together they move its crash estimate +8%: roadside results weigh far less than crash history.

Worth a closer look

From the FMCSA record. The grade already counts the safety items; insurance filings and links to other motor carriers are not in it.

  • Drivers put out of service
    2 out-of-service violations against drivers: 1 hours of service, 1 no valid CDL (Apr 2025 – Jul 2026).
    Ask: driver supervision and dispatch practices.
  • Filed fleet not seen on the road
    Only 13 of the 77 filed power units were seen at a roadside inspection in 24 months (12 inspections in all). The crash expectation behind the grade assumes all 77 are running.
    Ask: how many trucks are actually operating, with the vehicle schedule (the MCS-150 was last updated Apr 2025).
  • Driver out-of-service rate
    16.7% of driver inspections end out of service vs 6.7% nationally (2 of 12), but across all its inspections out-of-service orders are 1.18× what's expected for where and how it's inspected, the measure the grade uses.
Strengths
  • 1 crash in 24 months. No injuries, no fatalities.
  • No FMCSA BASIC alerts.
Data flags
  • Unreliable reported mileage
    The motor carrier's self-reported annual mileage (MCS-150) looks implausible, so exposure- and mileage-based figures may be distorted.
  • Estimated mileage
    No usable mileage was reported, so exposure was estimated from similar motor carriers. Mileage-based metrics here are approximate.

Track record

FMCSA record, Jan 2025 – Aug 2026 · grade scored on Sep 1, 2023 → Sep 30, 2026
Crashes
1
0 fatalities · 0 injuries · 0 tow-aways
Inspections
12
33% clean (no violations)
Vehicle out-of-service
12.5%
1 of 8
National avg 22.3%
Driver out-of-service
16.7%
2 of 12
National avg 6.7%
Violations
18
4 out-of-service

Inspected less often than interstate fleets of 50–99 trucks in Utah (about 89 in 24 months would be typical).

Inspections per quarter With an out-of-service order
Q1 '25: 1 inspections, 0 out of service 1 Q1 '25 Q2 '25: 3 inspections, 1 out of service 3 Q2 '25 Q3 '25: 2 inspections, 0 out of service 2 Q3 '25 Q4 '25: 0 inspections, 0 out of service 0 Q4 '25 Q1 '26: 1 inspections, 0 out of service 1 Q1 '26 Q2 '26: 1 inspections, 0 out of service 1 Q2 '26 Q3 '26: 4 inspections, 2 out of service 4 Q3 '26
vs 4,155 peer fleets
This motor carrierPeers
Crashes 0.006 0.026
Inspections 0.10 0.97
Violations 0.12 0.56
Critical violations 0.01 0.11

Yearly rates from the last 24 months. Peers: interstate fleets, 50–99 power units, medium-risk cargo.

What they get cited for

18 violations · 24 months
  • Vehicle maintenance No alert
    13 · 2 OOS
    Lights 3 · Brakes 2 · Other parts 8
  • Unsafe driving No alert
    2 · 0 OOS
    Speeding 2
  • Hours of service No alert
    2 · 1 OOS
    No log 2
  • Driver fitness No alert
    1 · 1 OOS
    No valid CDL 1
  • Drugs & alcohol No alert
    0
Out-of-service violations “No alert” = under FMCSA's BASIC intervention threshold

Violations by quarter

Tap a category to show or hide it
No violation trend data

Crashes

24 months
  • Apr
    10
    2026
    California
    Property damage only
    Daylight, two-way trafficway divided unprotected median.

No other reportable crashes on the FMCSA record.

Insurance filed with FMCSA

Today · live FMCSA check
Checking FMCSA…

No MC, FF or MX docket on FMCSA's registration for this motor carrier, so there are no insurance filings to show. FMCSA collects filings only from registered for-hire authorities; other motor carriers keep proof of insurance (MCS-90) at their place of business.

FMCSA filings only, not a policy audit. Not part of the FRED grade. Wrong or out of date?

Where it happens

Loading map data…
Inspections by state
  • California 3
  • Nevada 3
  • Washington 3
  • Idaho 2
  • Oregon 1