PROEXI LOGISTIC SA DE CV

DOT# 931902 MX# 400653 Nuevo Laredo, TA Authorized For-Hire
528672054635 isaac.perez@proexi.com Gutierrez 3430, Nuevo Laredo TA 88000
5 power units · all owned 2 drivers
Strong Provisional: the record is still thin. A fleet of 7 power units would expect only about 0.0 crashes over the 36-month scoring window, and it had 74 inspections and 0 crashes in that time, so the grade leans mostly on what's typical for similar fleets and can move as more inspections and time on the road build up.
FRED Score 79.7 / 100
Prior-only confidence
25 yrs history · 71 roadside inspections

FMCSA Live Status

Checking FMCSA…

Fleet & equipment

Power units
5
Drivers · CDL
2 · 0
Annual miles
70k unreliable
Type Own Term Trip Total
Trucks 5 0 0 5
Tractors 0 0 0 0
Trailers 1 15 0 16

Registration

Organization
INDIVIDUAL
Registered
02-06-2001 (25 yrs)
MCS-150 Update
09-28-2026 (Biennial Update)
FRED Score Date
Nov 08, 2026
Officer
AZUCENA DEL ROCIO GARCIA
Officer
JOSE JULIO PEREZ

Cargo

64.0
medium risk
General Freight
High-Risk Cargo
General Freight

Note: "General Freight" is a catch-all; the actual cargo mix and its risk may differ.

Estimated from the commodity types reported to FMCSA, not from loss history or the true cargo mix.

Advisory Grade — Outside the Ranked Book

Fleets under 10 power units are graded against their size cohort (pu6_9) for reference, but sit outside the 10+ power-unit underwriting book the FRED rank covers.

Mileage Unreliable

MCS-150 annual mileage appears too low for fleet size given observed activity. The per-100k-mile rate benchmarks on this page are excluded; the FRED grade does not use mileage (crash exposure is power-unit-years, violation exposure is inspection counts).

Too little record to tell how this motor carrier's crash rate compares with similar fleets.

Similar fleets: interstate fleets of 6–9 trucks with the same kind of operation, years in business and amount of road activity. Compared using its own crash record and roadside inspections.

Per truck, fleets like this one are expected to crash under a tenth as often as the median active fleet of 6–9 trucks.

This motor carrier 0.71×
ExcellentStrongSatisf.MarginalPoorCritical
▲ Similar fleets 1.0×
Expected crashes, next 12 months
0.0 vs 0.0 for similar fleets
Most likely none
This motor carrier
0.0
Similar fleets
0.0
Chance of a fatal crash, next 12 months
<1%
Below similar fleets.
What's driving the grade
Crash history
betterworse
Too little record to tell. 0 crashes on the FMCSA record in 24 months; similar fleets have under 0.1 a year.
Roadside inspections
betterworse
Better than peers. Unsafe-driving and hours-of-service violations 0.12× and violations 0.73× the rate expected for its inspections. Together they move its crash estimate -24%. It's inspected more often than most fleets its size.

Worth a closer look

From the FMCSA record. The grade already counts the safety items; insurance filings and links to other motor carriers are not in it.

  • Driver qualification
    4 out-of-service violations against drivers: 4 no valid CDL (Dec 2024 – Jul 2026).
    Ask: driver qualification files and hiring standards.
  • Brakes and tires
    Brakes are 34 of 147 violations (23%). Brake or tire defects led to 9 out-of-service orders.
    Ask: the preventive-maintenance schedule and shop records.
  • Cross-border operation
    65 inspections on Mexico-plated units; 66% of all inspections were in Texas.
    Ask: operating radius and Mexico lanes.
Strengths
  • No reportable crashes in 24 months.
  • No FMCSA BASIC alerts.
Data flags
  • Unreliable reported mileage
    The motor carrier's self-reported annual mileage (MCS-150) looks implausible, so exposure- and mileage-based figures may be distorted.
  • Estimated mileage
    No usable mileage was reported, so exposure was estimated from similar motor carriers. Mileage-based metrics here are approximate.
  • Mexico-domiciled motor carrier
    Domiciled in Mexico — cross-border operating rules and inspection patterns differ from US-based motor carriers.

Track record

FMCSA record, Sep 2024 – Sep 2026 · grade scored on Oct 1, 2023 → Oct 31, 2026
Crashes
0
0 fatalities · 0 injuries · 0 tow-aways
Inspections
71
31% clean (no violations)
Vehicle out-of-service
18.2%
12 of 66
National avg 22.3%
Driver out-of-service
5.6%
4 of 71
National avg 6.7%
Violations
147
17 out-of-service

Inspected about as often as interstate fleets of 2–5 trucks nationwide (about 50 in 24 months would be typical).

Inspections per quarter With an out-of-service order
Q4 '24: 9 inspections, 2 out of service 9 Q4 '24 Q1 '25: 9 inspections, 2 out of service 9 Q1 '25 Q2 '25: 9 inspections, 2 out of service 9 Q2 '25 Q3 '25: 6 inspections, 1 out of service 6 Q3 '25 Q4 '25: 16 inspections, 2 out of service 16 Q4 '25 Q1 '26: 8 inspections, 1 out of service 8 Q1 '26 Q2 '26: 6 inspections, 1 out of service 6 Q2 '26 Q3 '26: 7 inspections, 4 out of service 7 Q3 '26
Sep 25–30, 2024 isn't charted (too little of that quarter is on file); the 24-month totals include its 1 inspection.
vs 57,530 peer fleets
Inspections per power unit look like an outlier vs peers; read these rates with care.
This motor carrierPeers
Crashes 0.000 0.043
Inspections 9.00 1.57
Violations 14.70 1.56
Critical violations 3.30 0.29

Yearly rates from the last 24 months. Peers: interstate fleets, Small (advisory) power units, medium-risk cargo.

What they get cited for

147 violations · 24 months
  • Vehicle maintenance No alert
    122 · 13 OOS
    Brakes 34 · Tires 26 · Lights 20 · Steering & suspension 7 · Cargo securement 5 · 30 more
  • Driver fitness No alert
    25 · 4 OOS
    English proficiency 20 · No valid CDL 4 · Medical certificate 1
  • Unsafe driving No alert
    0
  • Hours of service No alert
    0
  • Drugs & alcohol No alert
    0
Out-of-service violations “No alert” = under FMCSA's BASIC intervention threshold

Violations by quarter

Tap a category to show or hide it
No violation trend data

Crashes

24 months

No reportable crashes on the FMCSA record in the last 24 months.

Insurance filed with FMCSA

FMCSA record through Nov 7, 2026
Today · live FMCSA check
Checking FMCSA…
Liability (BIPD)
FMCSA lists no liability minimum for this authority.
Cargo filing
not required by FMCSA (household-goods motor carriers only); the cargo policy is not on FMCSA's record

Mexico-domiciled operating authority active (FMCSA's new registration system, status since Sep 5, 2003)

Who insures fleets like this →

FMCSA filings only, not a policy audit. Not part of the FRED grade. Wrong or out of date?

Where it happens

Loading map data…
Inspections by state
  • Texas 47
  • Federal inspectors 24

Runs well beyond its home state: 0 of 71 inspections were in TA.